FSP LLC - Current News

What did you think of today?®

Charles Mirho

Senior IP Counsel

Laura Lee Norris

Corporate General Counsel

Janina Malone

FSP LLC

P.O. Box 890
Vancouver, WA 98666-0890

E-mail: patents@fspllc.com
Phone: 360-737-1748
Fax: 360-294-6426

The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision. Before you decide, contact us for a free consultation. Please read our FULL DISCLAIMER.

Current FSP LLC News

RSS | View Archives

	Patent Ownership, Assignment Monday, March 01, 2010 A plaintiff generally has the burden of proving standing to sue. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (more...)

	Collateral Estoppel, Claim Construction (same for Validity and Infringement), Indefiniteness, "Standard" as a Claim Term Monday, March 01, 2010 SST argues that LendingTree is estopped from relying on the bricks and mortar prior art for failure to raise it in a (more...)

	Means Function Claims, Expert Opinions, Specificity Needed In Alleging Infringement Monday, March 01, 2010 For a means-plus-function claim term, the term literally covers an accused device if the relevant structure in the (more...)

	Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction, Patent Holding Company Monday, March 01, 2010 Note: The judge weighed Acceleron's status as a patent holding company as a factor in deciding if DJ jurisdiction (more...)

	Obviousness, KSR applied, Examiner Knowledge In Lieu of References Monday, March 01, 2010 In KSR, the Court offered guidance that has now been cited repeatedly: When there is a design need or market (more...)

	Laches, Indefiniteness, Typos in Claims Monday, March 01, 2010 To prevail on a defense of laches, CTS must prove two elements: (1) Plaintiffs delayed filing suit for an unreasonable (more...)

	False Marking, 35 U.S.C. 292 Friday, February 26, 2010 I. False Marking--Knowledge The two elements of a §292 false marking claim are (1) marking an unpatented article (more...)

	Design Patent Infringement, Design Patent Anticipation, Design Patent Obviousness, 35 U.S.C. 171 Friday, February 26, 2010 Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (en banc), changed the test for infringement. In (more...)

	NEW EPO RULES FOR DIVISIQNALS EPO Rules regarding divisional applications coming into force on April 1, 2010 Sunday, February 07, 2010 The new rules introduce a fixed and non-extendable deadline of 24 months for filing divisionals, which is triggered by (more...)

	Markel Enterprises LLC Sunday, December 20, 2009 Markel Enterprises LLC provides product design and engineering services and China sourcing and manufacturing using (more...)

	PRIORITY RIGHTS IN UK AND EPO APPLICATIONS Monday, December 07, 2009 A recent UK High Court decision (Edwards v Cook) may have ramifications for any IP right pursued in the UK or Europe (more...)

	35 USC 102(b) Wednesday, December 02, 2009 Section 102(b) provides that "[a] person shall be entitled to a patent unless . . . the invention was . . . described (more...)

	Patent License, Subsidiaries, Agreements to Grant Tuesday, December 01, 2009 This case involves the scope of Imation's licenses, each of which states in relevant part that Philips "agrees to (more...)

	35 USC 102(b) Thursday, November 26, 2009 Section 102(b) provides that "[a] person shall be entitled to a patent unless . . . the invention was . . . described (more...)

	Administrative Procedure Act, Anticipation, Meaning of 'comprising', Antecedent Basis, Written Description Wednesday, November 18, 2009 The PTO is governed by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and the rulings of its tribunals receive the APA (more...)

Displaying Page 1 of 7

First | Previous | Next | Last

View Archives

Contents ©1998-2010 FSP, LLC | All Rights Reserved
FSP, LLC | P.O. Box 890 | Vancouver, WA 98666-0890

Home | Professional Team | Services | News | FAQ | Resources | Contact Us
Phone: 360-737-1748 | Fax: 360-294-6426 | patents@fspllc.com
Web Site and Application Design by Peabody Marketing Group